Carter v. Credit Bureau of Carbon County
Plaintiff: Deborah Carter
Defendant: Credit Bureau of Carbon City
Case Number: 1:2014cv00873
Filed: March 25, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: John L. Kane
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 60 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.ORDERED that judgment shall enter in favor of Plaintiff Deborah Carter and against Defendant Credit Bureau of Carbon County d/b/a CollectionCenter, Inc. in the amount of $1,000 for violation of the Sect ion 1692e(8) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action. See 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3). It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file any motion for an award of attorney fees and bill of costs within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. Entered by Judge John L. Kane on 7/20/2015. (babia, )
July 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 59 STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge John L. Kane on 7/13/2015. (babia)
July 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER granting 50 Motion to Amend Final Pre-Trial Conference Order. Defendant may include the documents recently received from Douglas Family Medicine as Exhibits for Trial by Judge John L. Kane on 07/01/15.(jhawk, )
April 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 46 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Plaintiffs 37 Motion is DENIED and Defendant's 40 Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Entered by Judge John L. Kane on 04/16/15.(jhawk, )
November 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Setting Pretrial Conference for 12/2/2014 02:00 PM before Judge John L. Kane by Judge John L. Kane on 11/04/14. (jhawk, )
October 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 23 Renewed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, by Judge John L. Kane on 10/06/2014. (athom, )
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER denying 16 Motion for Protective Order by Judge John L. Kane on 07/18/14.(jhawk, )
June 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER for Response to Motion for Protective Order and Granting Motion for Extension of Time 15 . Plaintiff must Respond to Defendant's Motion for Protective Order, Doc. 16, by or on June 27th, 2014. Defendant's Answer to Initial Discovery would, but for the extension, be due on July 2, 2014, Defendant's deadline by which to provide an Answer to Initial Discovery is extended to August 1,2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 06/12/14. (jhawk, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter v. Credit Bureau of Carbon County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Credit Bureau of Carbon City
Represented By: Jeffrey Michael Logue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Carter
Represented By: Ahson Barkat Wali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?