Rappucci v. High Sierra Energy, LP et al
| Lori Rappucci |
| High Sierra Energy, LP and NGL Energy Partners, LP |
| 1:2014cv00977 |
| April 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| R. Brooke Jackson |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 49 Motion to Dismiss by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/9/14.(jdyne, )
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion to Amend complaint. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 10/24/2014.(trlee, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE: This matter has been scheduled for a five day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A902, 9th Floor, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on May 11, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. A Trial Preparation Conference is set for April 17, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 07/21/2014. (rbjsec. )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 04/08/2014. (rbjsec. )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
