Ybanez v. Scott, et al
| Nathan Ybanez |
| Bernadette Scott, C. Mathis and Bernadette (I) Scott |
| 1:2014cv01059 |
| April 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
JUDGMENT in favor of Bernadette Scott, Candy Mathis against Nathan Ybanez re: 92 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Report and Recommendations, by Clerk on 7/6/15. (pglov)
|
|
Filing
71
OPINION AND ORDER SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART OBJECTIONS TO RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS: Mr. Ybanez's Objections 28 are OVERRULED and the Court AFFIRMS the Magistrate J udge's July 1, 2014 Minute Order (#26) denying Mr. Ybanez's Motion for Attorney Assistance. Mr. Ybanez's Objections (#42) are SUSTAINED and the Court DECLINES TO ADOPT the Magistrate Judge's October 14 , 2014 Recommendation 41 that the claim against Defendant Mathis be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve. Mr. Ybanez's Objections (#53) are DENIED AS MOOT as to the Magistrate Judge's October 29, 2014 Min ute Order (#51) denying Mr. Ybanez's Motion for Leave to Amend his Complaint (#47). Mr. Ybanez's Objections (#54) are SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART and the Court ADOPTS IN PART AND DECLINES IN PART< /b> the Magistrate Judge's October 30, 2014 Recommendation 52 . The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 29 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set forth herein. Wihtin 30 days of this Order, Mr. Ybanez may file an Amended Complai nt that: (i) substitutes Candy Mathis for Defendant "Unknown SCF Mail Room Employee C. Mathis" and (ii) alleges facts sufficient to show that this action is timely under the prison mailbox rule. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/17/15.(msksec, )
|
|
Filing
70
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 68 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 37, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/10/2015.(slibi, )
|
|
Filing
67
MINUTE ORDER granting 56 Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery. Discovery STAYED. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/3/2015.(emill)
|
|
Filing
64
MINUTE ORDER granting 58 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's November 6, 2014 Written Discovery Requests; granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Strike Ex Parte Pleading or for Service and Extension of Time to Respond, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/10/2014.(slibi, )
|
|
Filing
51
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 47 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Pleadings, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/29/2014.(emill)
|
|
Filing
46
MINUTE ORDER: Denying 42 Plaintiff's Motion Showing Cause. Denying as moot 43 Plaintiff's Motion to Facilitate Service of Process. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/16/2014.(emill)
|
|
Filing
26
MINUTE ORDER denying 22 Motion for Attorney Assistance in Conduction Oral Depositions by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 7/1/14.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE FOR PRO SE PLAINTIFF. Status Conference set for 6/9/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/24/2014. (emill)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if appropriate, to a magistrate judge. Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/21/2014. (smoor)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
