Trail's End Ranch, LLC et al v. USA
Trail's End Ranch, LLC and Trail's End Operating, LLC |
USA |
1:2014cv01328 |
May 12, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Custer |
Richard P. Matsch |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 JUDGMENT by Clerk Pursuant to the Findings, Conclusions and Order for Judgment, judgment is entered for the defendant United States of America and against plaintiffs Trail's End Ranch, LLC, and Trail's End Operating, LLC. This civil action is dismissed. Defendant is awarded costs upon the filing of a bill of costs within 14 days, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/23/16. (ktera) |
Filing 49 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/3/2016. (ebuch) |
Filing 44 ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE This case is set for trial to the Court on February 1, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., (counsel to be present at 8:30 a.m.) in Courtroom A, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/16/15. (ktera) |
Filing 41 COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held before Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/7/2015. Denying 36 Defendant's Motion to Amend Pretrial Order. Alfonso Montoya, Matthew Basquez, Nathan Mode, and Joseph Schwedhelm shall not appear as witnesses. FTR: K. Terasaki. (ebuch) |
Filing 30 ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE This matter is set for trial to the Court on December 14, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., (counsel to be present at 8:30 a.m.) in Courtroom A, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/17/18. (ktera) |
Filing 26 MINUTE ORDER Defendant's unopposed motion to vacate the July 21, 2015, pretrial conference is granted. The pretrial conference is rescheduled for September 17, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. The proposed Final Pretrial Order must be submitted in paper form directly to chambers on or before 4:00 p.m. on September 10, 2015, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/23/15. (ktera) |
Filing 24 ORDER Pretrial conference is scheduled for July 21, 2015, at 3:00 p.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. The proposed Final Pretrial Order, original only, shall be delivered in paper form directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on July 16, 2015. The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or representatives of parties will be permitted to attend, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/3/15. (ktera) |
Filing 19 ORDER to Comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 in court filings re: 18 Protective Order, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/4/2015. (evana, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 9/18/2014 at 11:00 AM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on September 11, 2014, lead counsel present in person, initial disclosure s under Rule 26(a)(1) will be completed no later than 10 calendar days before the scheduling conference, and counsel for plaintiffs shall file respective disclosure statements pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/29/2014. (jsmit ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.