Meek v. Administrative Review Board et al
Timothy Meek |
Administrative Review Board, Koontz and Jordan |
1:2014cv01335 |
May 13, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Boyd N. Boland |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/1/15. (msksec, ) |
Filing 51 SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS: This Opinion and Order is a supplement to the Court's August 20, 2015 Opinion and Order 50 . The Motion to Dismiss 30 is GRANTED with respect to the Plaintiff's claim for viol ation of C.R.S. § 18-1-411, which is dismissed without leave to amend. The only claim remaining in this case is Plaintiff's claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of his 14th Amendment procedural due process rights as a pretrial detainee. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 8/24/15. (msksec, ) |
Filing 50 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO RECOMMENDATION, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 8/20/15. The Recommendation 44 is adopted in part and declined in part. (dkals, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint; The 13 Motion to Transfer Exhibits is denied, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 7/31/14.(morti, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/13/14. (morti, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.