Ramos-Reyes v. Grand Island Express, Inc. et al
| Rafael Ramos-Reyes |
| Grand Island Express, Inc. and Matthew Burger |
| 1:2014cv01357 |
| May 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Adams |
| Raymond P. Moore |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER granting joint stipulated motion for dismissal with prejudice 39 . By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/9/2015. (tscha, )
|
|
Filing
38
MINUTE ORDER; 36 Joint Motion to Extend the Deadline to File Dismissal Papers is GRANTED. Dismissal Papers due no later than 1/7/2015. 21 Motion for Protective Order is DENIED AS MOOT, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/23/14.(morti, )
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER granting 28 Motion to Amend scheduling order. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/12/2014.(tscha, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER setting Scheduling/planning Conference for 7/10/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/23/2014. (trlee, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Granting Stipulation of Plaintiff and Defendants Grand Island Express, Inc. and Matthew Burger Regarding Physiatry Independent Medical Examination. by Andrew Patrick McCallin, District Court Judge, Denver County on 04/01/2014. (dbera, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
