Purac America Incorporated v. Birko Corporation
| Purac America Incorporated |
| Birko Corporation |
| 1:2014cv01669 |
| June 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. The Court hereby dismisses this action with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 06/08/2015. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Dismiss by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 4/8/15.(jdyne, )
|
|
Filing
38
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 10/20/14. (jdyne, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE: This matter has been scheduled for an eight day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A902, 9th Floor, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on February 1, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. See order for details. A Trial Preparation Conference is set for January 22, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 09/26/2014. (rbjsec. )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. In light of the decline of consent to a magistrate judge by at least one party in this case [ECF No. 14], and the reassignment of this action to this Court [ECF No. 1 5], the parties are ordered to set a scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. The scheduling conference set on August 26, 2014 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe is vacated. Please see the order for additional details. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 07/28/2014. (rbjsec. )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PILOT PROGRAM CONSENT FORM. On or before 7/30/2014, parties shall complete and file the Pilot Program Consent Form 9 . Scheduling Conference set for 8/13/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Consent Form due by 7/30/2014. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/19/2014. (emill)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Purac America Incorporated v. Birko Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Purac America Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | David Christopher Holman |
| Represented By: | Kenzo Sunao Kawanabe |
| Represented By: | Chad David Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Birko Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Sarah Block Wallace |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
