Zbylski et al v. Douglas County School District et al
| Marianne Zbylski and Mark Zbylski |
| Douglas County School District, Patricia Dierberger and James McMurphy |
| 1:2014cv01676 |
| June 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 70 Motion for Sanctions and finding as moot 66 Motion for Sanctions. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/31/15. (nywlc1)
|
|
Filing
107
MINUTE ENTRY for Law and Motion Hearing held before Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/3/2015. 69 Motion for Leave is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part in accordance with the Court's oral ruling; Amended Joint 702 Motion due by 11/17/2015. Rule 702 Evidentiary Hearing set for 2/22/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 901 before Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Court Reporter: Janet Coppock. (pglov)
|
|
Filing
103
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Motion Hearing held on October 8, 2015, before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence 66 / 70 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Discussion held regarding if the restrictions are appropriate. The court will review and issue an omnibus order. Parties are instructed to review and comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 prior to filing any additional restricted documents.FTR: Courtroom C-204. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting 56 Motion to Compel. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/21/15. (nywlc1)
|
|
Filing
60
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 08/13/15 GRANTING 55 Motion to Amend Complaint and Jury Demand and Motion to Amend Caption. The Clerk of the Court is directed to [55-1] for filing as the Second Amended Complaint and to amend the case caption accordingly. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
54
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/10/15 re: Second Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order 52 . The Motion is GRANTED, the discovery deadline is extended up to and including 7/14/2015 for the purpose of taking the one requested deposition. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
51
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6/10/15 granting 49 Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 7/10/2015. Dispositive Motions due by 8/24/2015. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
41
MINUTE ORDER granting 39 Unopposed Motion to Restrict Exhibit A of Defendants' Motion to Compel Criminal Justice Records and Evidence from the Douglas County Sheriff's Office by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/6/15.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
38
MINUTE ORDER granting 35 Unopposed Motion to Compel Criminal Justice Records and Evidence from the Douglas County Sheriff's Office by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/24/15.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
29
MINUTE ORDER granting 27 Unopposed Motion to Amend Complaint and Jury Demand by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/22/14.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
24
TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/19/14. (msksec, )
|
|
Filing
21
PROTECTIVE ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/17/14. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/20/14. Scheduling Conference set for 9/18/2014 02:30 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. (bsimm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
