Teets v. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
| John Teets |
| Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company |
| 1:2014cv02330 |
| August 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 04/20/16 GRANTING 76 Motion for In Camera Inspection; and GRANTING 100 Motion for Leave to Restrict. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to MAINTAIN a Level 1 Restriction for the following documents: [#69], [#74-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,17, and 18.] The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to NOTE ON THE DOCKET:[#76-1] as Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification (Redacted Version of [#69]); [#76-2] as the Rebuttal Expert Report of Steve Pom erantz (Redacted Version of [#76-16]; and [#76-3] as the Expert Report of Steve Pomerantz (Redacted Version of #74-19). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to MAINTAIN a Level 1 Restriction for the following documents: [#82], [#83] [#83-1], [#83-2], [ #84-1], [#84-2], [#84-3,] [#84-4], [#84-5], [#86], [#86-1], [#86-2], [#88], [#89], [#90], [#91], [#92], [#93], [#94-1,2,4,5,6,7,8 and 11]. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to NOTE ON THE DOCKET: [#100-2] as Defendants Motion to Exclude Expert Opini on of Steven Pomerantz on Excess Fee and Damages (Redacted Version of [#82]); [#100-3] as the Declaration of Christine Moritz in Support of Defendants Motion to Exclude Expert Opinion of Steven Pomerantz on Excess Fee and Damages (Redacted Version of [#83]); [#100-4] as Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Daniel R. Thies in Support of Defendants Motion to Exclude Expert Opinion of Steven Pomerantz on Excess Fee and Damages (Redacted Version of [#84-3]); [#100-5] as Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Da niel R. Thies in Support of Defendants Motion to Exclude Expert Opinion of Steven Pomerantz on Excess Fee and Damages (Redacted Version of [#84-4]);[#100-6] as Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Daniel R. Thies in Support of Defendants Motion to Exclude Expert Opinion of Steven Pomerantz on Excess Fee and Damages (Redacted Version of [#84-5]); [#100-7] as the Declaration of David McLeod in Support of Defendants Motion to Exclude Expert Opinion of Steven Pomerantz on Excess Fee and Damages (Redacted Version of [#86]);[#100-8] as Defendants Memorandum in Opposition to Class Certification (Redacted Version of [#88]); [#100-9] as the Declaration of Dan Armstrong in Support of Defendants Memorandum in Opposition to Class Certification (Redacted Ver sion of [#89]); [#100-10] as the Declaration of Ryan Derbes in Support of Defendants Memorandum in Opposition to Class Certification (Redacted Version of [#90]); [#100-11] as the Declaration of David McLeod (Redacted Version of [#91]); [#100-12] as t he Declaration of Christine Moritz (Redacted Version of [#92]); [#100-13] as the Declaration of Brian Morris (Redacted Version of [#93]); [#100-14] as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Daniel R. Thies in Support of Defendants Memorandum in Opposition t o Class Certification (Redacted Version of [#94-1]); [#100-15] as Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Daniel R. Thies in Support of Defendants Memorandum in Opposition to Class Certification (Redacted Version of [#94-2]); and[#100-16] as Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Daniel R. Thies in Support of Defendants Memorandum in Opposition to Class Certification (Redacted Version of [#94-6]). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to UNRESTRICT the following documents: [#84-6], [#93-1], and [#94-3]. To facilitate the courts review, and for clarity on the courts docket, for any future motion to restrict, the Parties are DIRECTED to file the proposed Order at the end of the attachments.
|
|
Filing
57
MINUTE ORDER granting 55 Motion to Withdraw 55 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw JULIE WILENSKY AS PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/21/15.(nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
51
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/13/15 re: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for an Order Modifying the Scheduling Order and Extending Expert Disclosure and Related Deadlines 49 . The Motion is GRANTED and the Scheduling Order 34 is modified as follows: Expert designation due by 11/17/2015; Rebuttal expert designation due by 12/17/2015; Class certification discovery due by 1/19/2015; Motion for class certification due by 2/17/2015. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER Defendants Motion to Dismiss ECF No. 22 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; The Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs Claim 3 under ERISA § 406(a), 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a), and that claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and The Motion is DENIED in all other respects, by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/22/2015.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/20/14. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
26
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/02/14 DENYING as moot 23 Unopposed Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically at October 14,2014 Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set for October 14, 2014 is VACATED. This matter will be reset once the case has been redrawn.(nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/29/14. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall complete and file the Consent Form on or before October 10, 2014. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference and Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/05/2014. Scheduling Conference set for 10/14/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. (slibi, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
