Ross Dress for Less, Inc. v. Walton Foothills Holdings VI, L.L.C. et al
| Ross Dress for Less, Inc. |
| Foothills Metropolitan District and Walton Foothills Holdings VI, L.L.C. |
| 1:2014cv02517 |
| September 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER. ORDERED that the Temporary Restraining Order [Docket No. 38], which was converted to a preliminary injunction by joint stipulation [Docket No. 40], is hereby DISSOLVED by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/04/14. (jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER: The portion of plaintiff's Verified Emergency Motion for Ex ParteTemporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 20 seeking a temporary restraining order is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the attached Order. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/23/14. (pabsec)
|
|
Filing
30
AMENDED ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 12/9/2014 10:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/22/14. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference set for 12/9/2014 10:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Consent Form due by 12/9/2014, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/16/14. (sgrim)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
