USA v. 16650 Jasmine Street, Brighton, Colorado et al
USA |
16650 Jasmine Street, Brighton, Colorado, 2004 Toyota Sienna Van, 121 Assorted Marijuana Grow Equipment, 242 Assorted Marijuana Grow Equipment and 283 Assorted Marijuana Grow Equipment |
1:2014cv02630 |
September 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Boyd N. Boland |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of USA against 121 Assorted Marijuana Grow Equipment, 2004 Toyota Sienna Van re: 33 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, Order on Report and Recommendations, by Clerk on 4/24/2015. (evana, ) |
Filing 32 FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE as to 2004 Toyota Sienna Van and 121 Assorted Marijuana Grow Equipment. It is Ordered that forfeiture of 2004 Toyota Sienna Van, VIN: 5TDZA22CX4S201270 and 121 Assorted Marijuana Grow Equipment shall enter in favor of the United States; the United States shall have full and legal title to the forfeited property, and may dispose of it in accordance with law. By Judge William J. Martinez on 3/23/2015. (alowe) |
Filing 28 ORDER granting 27 Motion to Dismiss Party Party 16650 Jasmine Street, Brighton, Colorado terminated. By Judge William J. Martinez on 3/3/2015.(tscha, ) |
Filing 23 ORDER Requesting Reassignment of Case to a District Judge, on the basis that consent was not achieved, by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/26/15. (nmarb, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.