Bergerud v. Falk et al
| Allen Bergerud |
| James Falk and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2014cv02728 |
| October 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/25/16. (dkals, ) Modified on 1/25/2016 to note that this was filed in error, and does not apply to this case (dkals, ).
|
|
Filing
28
JUDGMENT in favor of The Attorney General of the State of Colorado, James Falk against Allen Bergerud re: 27 Order Denying Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Clerk on 10/2/15. (pglov)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 01/06/15. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 01/06/15 For State Court Record and To Answer. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this order to the clerk of the state court from which the case originated and to the Court Services Manager, Office of the State Court Administrator, (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER To Respondents to File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/5/14. (nmarb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
