Audubon Society of Greater Denver v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
| Audubon Society of Greater Denver |
| United States Army Corps of Engineers |
| 1:2014cv02749 |
| October 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| John L. Kane |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER. Petitioner's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 75 is DENIED. Respondent's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time 76 is DENIED as moot. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/12/17. (pabsec)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 44 Motion for Leave Student Attorney Bradley Neagos to Appear. Signed by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/16/15.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER. This case is REMITTED to the Clerk for immediate random assignment to a merits judge under D.C.COLO.LCiv.R 40.1. The parties are reminded that the case remains an administrative appeal under the Court's Local Appellate (LAP) Rules and that briefing and other pre-merits procedures remain governed by the LAP Rules and the operative Joint Case Management Plan. Entered by Judge John L. Kane on 06/23/15. (jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 Motion to Intervene, by Judge John L. Kane on 02/06/2015. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 17 Motion to Intervene, by Judge John L. Kane on 01/22/2015. (athom, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
