Mardis v. D.R.D.C., et al
| Alexander Mardis |
| James Falk, Hoffman, Rendon, Shaeffer, D.R.D.C. and Scherbarth |
| 1:2014cv02761 |
| October 9, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/13/15. (dkals, )
|
Filing
26
MINUTE ORDER denying as premature 24 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; denying as premature 25 Motion to Produce Records/Data Compilations, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/15/2015. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this minute order to file one complete third amended prisoner complaint. (slibi, )
|
Filing
21
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Second Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/03/2014. (slibi, )
|
Filing
18
MINUTE ORDER denying as premature 17 Omnibus Motion to Compel Discovery, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/13/2014.(slibi, )
|
Filing
14
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/04/2014. (slibi, )
|
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/14/2014. (slibi, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.