Drotar v. Walbrick et al
Ellen Drotar |
Johnny Walbrick, Secura Supreme Insurance Company and Progressive Preferred Insurance Company |
1:2014cv02845 |
October 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Adams |
Richard P. Matsch |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's claims against Defendants are dismissed, each party to pay their own attorneys' fees and costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/16/15. (ktera) |
Filing 33 MINUTE ORDER Pursuant to the Notice of Settlement 32 , the parties shall file a stipulation for dismissal on or before October 16, 2015, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/25/15. (ktera) |
Filing 12 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 1/6/2015 at 10:30 AM in Conference Room, lead counsel present in person, proposed order (original only)on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on, December 30, 2014, initial disclosures u nder Rule 26(a)(1) will be completed no later than 10 calendar days before the scheduling conference, and counsel for Defendants Secura Supreme Insurance Company and Progressive Preferred Insurance Company shall file respective disclosure statements pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/4/2014. (jsmit) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.