USA v. $72,800.00 in United States Currency
| USA |
| $72,800.00 in United States Currency |
| Todd Nelson |
| 1:2014cv02929 |
| October 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Christine M. Arguello |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
Final JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of USA against $72,800.00 in United States Currency on 5/04/2016. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/26/16 Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference set for 3/11/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/19/16 GRANTING 22 Unopposed MOTION to Reopen Case filed by USA. Status Report due by 2/26/2016. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/22/15 granting 17 Motion to Stay. The Unopposed Motion to Stay 17 is GRANTED; This civil action will be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending the resolution of Mr. Nelson's criminal adjudication in Denver County District Court; and The Parties are DIRECTED to file a Status Report and/or Motion to Reopen the Case within 30 days of any verdict and/or judgment in Mr. Nelson's criminal case. (bsimm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
