Hodson v. Fisher et al
| Travis Hodson |
| Birgit Fisher, Rochelle Beier-Kememt and Ward C-1 Staff |
| 1:2014cv03026 |
| November 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Pueblo |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MINUTE ORDER denying 25 Motion to alter or Amend the Judgment by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/21/15.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying 22 Motion to Writ of Coram Nobis and 23 Motion to Reconsider Relief by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/20/15.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER denying 20 "Motion to Relief From Judgment" by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/12/15.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pampers on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/23/15. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
8
SECOND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/17/14 To Cure Deficiencies. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail to Mr. Hodson,together with a copy of this order, a copy of the Court-approved form for filing a Prisoners Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies and File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/11/14. (nmarb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
