Graham v. Teller County, Colorado et al
| Thomas Graham |
| Teller County, Colorado, Mike (I) Ensminger, Mike Ensminger, Michael (I) Romero, Michael Romero, Josh (I) Weatherill, Josh Weatherill, Nick (I) Hartbauer, Nick Hartbauer, Jesse (I) Baker and Jesse Baker |
| 1:2014cv03059 |
| November 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| El Paso |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER FOR AMENDED JUDGMENT Final judgment is amended to dismiss this case with prejudice, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/22/15. (ktera)
|
|
Filing
63
JUDGMENT by Clerk Pursuant to the Order of Dismissal entered by Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch on May 11, 2015, this civil action is dismissed. (ktera)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Granting 19 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Thomas Graham, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttnyR 15., by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/19/2015. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Upon reassignment of this civil action and this Courts case management procedures, it is ORDERED that the 28 Order of Reference to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty is vacated, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/18/2015. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
7
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 5 Motion to Dismiss by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/11/2014. Defendant is granted leave to re-file if defendant so chooses.(mdave )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
