Malveaux v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Alcin Malveaux
Defendant: Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv03137
Filed: November 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Christine M. Arguello
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 74 MINUTE ORDER granting 72 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order to Extend the Deadline for Plaintiff to Depose an Employee of the Defendant by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 02/24/2016. Discovery due by 3/31/2016.(mdave, )
December 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MINUTE ORDER denying 56 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/01/2015.(mdave, )
September 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MINUTE ORDER granting 52 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/4/2015. Discovery due by 11/30/2015. Dispositive Motions due by 1/15/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/15/2016 09:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty.(mdave, )
August 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MINUTE ORDER denying 49 Defendant's Renewed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order and for Extension of Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure Deadline by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/27/2015.(mdave, )
August 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MINUTE ORDER denying 46 Unopposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order for Extension of Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure Deadline by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/26/2015.(mdave, )
April 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/20/2015. (mdave )
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 03/18/2015. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint [filed March 12; 2015; docket # 32 ] is granted. The Partial Motion to Dismiss [filed February 20, 2015; docket # 29 ] is denied as moot. The Defendant shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 and all applicable local and federal rules. (athom, )
January 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 01/06/2015. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Correct Name of Defendant [filed December 23, 2014;docket # 10 ] is granted. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Additional Time to Complete Service [filed December 24, 2014; docket # 11 ] is granted. The Plaintiff shall serve the Defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 on or before January 15, 2015. (athom, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Malveaux v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alcin Malveaux
Represented By: Rosemary Orsini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?