Cross, Jr. v. Jackman et al
Elmer L. Cross, Jr. |
J. Jackman, Padilla, Franks and Cat Metzger |
1:2014cv03406 |
December 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Gordon P. Gallagher |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER dismissing this action, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/4/15. 18 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is granted. (dkals, ) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 01/07/15 denying as premature the following motions: 4 Motion for Order; 5 Motion for Hearing/Conference; 6 Motion for Hearing/Conference; 7 Motion for Hearing/Conference; and 8 Motion for Hearing/Conference. Plaintiff shall have up to and including February 10, 2015 to comply with the Courts December 22 Order by submitting a Prisoners Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 on the proper form and a certified copy of histrust fund statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his Prisoner Complaint. The Clerk of the Court also is directed to send to Plaintiff a copy of the Prisoners Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to § 1915.(nmarb, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Plaintiff To Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/22/14. (nmarb, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.