Seymore v. Clerk of Denver County Court et al
| Christable E. Seymore |
| Denver County Jail and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2015cv00024 |
| January 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER dismissing this action with prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/11/15. No certificate of appealability shall issue, and 12 Prisoner Complaint is stricken. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response; 10 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is GRANTED. 7 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 in a Habeas Corpus Action is DENIED because it if filed on the incorrect form and is otherwise moot. 11 Motion Requesting Extension is DENIED without prejudice. 1 Applicant's Motion is DENIED as superseded by the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, that Applicant filed on January 23, 2015 in response to the Courts Order Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/27/15.(morti, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/6/15. (morti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
