Sardina et al v. Charles et al
Marisol Sardina, Columba Rodriguez, Margarita Herrera, Margarita Lopez, Angelica Lugo, Blanca Avila, Jessica Morales Tavera, Patricia Alejandre Garcia, Maria Quinones, Rosaura Zavala and Alberto Echeverria |
Long Peak Arches Inc, McDonalds Corporation, Lorena Estrada, Cliff Pete, Robert F Charles and Mile High Drive-In Inc |
1:2015cv00054 |
January 8, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Robert E. Blackburn |
Kristen L. Mix |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
15 U.S.C. ยง 5 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 178 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' 171 Unopposed Motion for Approval of Collective Action Settlement. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 07/20/2017. (athom, ) |
Filing 125 MINUTE ORDER; 120 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order is GRANTED. Discovery deadline is extended to 4/12/2016, for the sole purpose of completing outstanding depositions in this case, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/1/16.(morti, ) |
Filing 124 ORDER Granting 76 Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Collective Action Certification and for Judicial Notice to Class Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b)B. Signed by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/29/2016.(cmira) |
Filing 118 MINUTE ORDER; Defendant's 57 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and the Plaintiff's 74 Motion to Strike Defendants Reply in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 72] Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d) and REB Civ. Practice Standard IV.C.1-3 are DENIED as moot, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/17/16.(morti, ) |
Filing 116 ORDER That the parties Stipulation of Dismissal for Plaintiffs Colorado State Law Breach of Contract Claims Against All Defendants 114 , filed February 2, 2016 is approved; and That plaintiffs Colorado state law breach of contract claims agains t all defendants (the Seventh and Eighth Claims for Relief asserted in plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint 48 , filed June 16, 2015) are dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs as to the dismissed claims, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/10/2016. (evana, ) |
Filing 97 ORDER Granting 89 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff, Margarita Lopez From This Case Without Prejudice, and the caption shall be amended accordingly, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/15/2015.(evana, ) |
Filing 73 ORDER approving 71 Stipulation of Dismissal for Plaintiffs' Colorado State Law Wage and Hour Claims Brought Pursuant to C.R.S. §§ 8-6-101 et seq. Against Defendants Lorena Estrada and Cliff Pete, Individually. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/10/2015. (mlace, ) |
Filing 69 STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING F.R.E. 502(d) by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/20/15. (lgale, ) |
Filing 54 TRIAL PREPARTATION CONFERENCE ORDER Dispositive Motions due by 2/29/2016. 10 day Jury Trial set for 8/22/2016 08:30 AM before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Trial Preparation Conference set for 8/5/2016 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/29/2015. (mlace, ) |
Filing 47 ORDER approving 40 Report and Recommendations, and granting 38 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/16/15.(dkals, ) |
Filing 28 ORDER dismissing with prejudice McDonalds Corporation by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/4/15. (dkals, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.