Developers Surety and Indemnity Company v. Asby et al
| Developers Surety and Indemnity Company |
| Evan Asby, Jacqueline Asby, Robert M. Seidel, Melanie F. Seidel and Powderhorn Park IV Partnership, LLLP |
| 1:2015cv00079 |
| January 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER denying as moot 47 Motion for Summary Judgment, and granting 52 Stipulated Motion for Judgment. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment by separate entry in favor of Plaintiff Developers Surety and Indemnity Company and against Defendants Robert M. Seidel and Melanie F. Seidel, jointly and severally. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 2/22/2016. (cpear)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER re: 52 Stipulated MOTION for Judgment Entry by Confession filed by Developers Surety and Indemnity Company, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 02/10/2016. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 06/25/15. Scheduling Conference set for 7/17/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/16/15. Scheduling Conference set for 4/22/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. (bsimm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
