Burnell v. Colvin
Richard Burnell |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
SSA Noticing |
1:2015cv00308 |
February 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Adams |
John L. Kane |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER Granting 23 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/18/2016.(evana, ) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion for Attorney Fees. Entered by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/27/15.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 20 FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Richard Burnell against Carolyn W. Colvin re: 19 Order on Motion to Remand to Agency. The final decision of the agency is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)., by Clerk on 8/20/2015. (evana, ) |
Filing 19 ORDER Granting 18 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Remand. The final decision of the agency is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993)., by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/19/2015.(evana, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.