Bardales-Rivera v. Holder et al
| Misael Bardales-Rivera |
| Eric Holder, Sarah Saldana, Jeh Johnson, Homero Mendoza and Corina E. Almeida |
| 1:2015cv00443 |
| March 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
Final JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Loretta Lynch against Misael Bardales-Rivera re: 38 Order, on 10/20/2015. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER re: denying 29 Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed by Misael Bardales-Rivera. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/19/2015. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
36
MINUTE ORDER granting 29 Motion for Leave to Amend Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/14/2015.(slibi, )
|
|
Filing
28
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Corina E. Almeida, Eric Holder, Homero Mendoza, Jeh Johnson, Sarah Saldana against Misael Bardales-Rivera, on 9/01/2015. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, filed by Misael Bardales-Rivera, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/31/2015. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
18
MINUTE ORDER re: 15 Order to Show Cause by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/21/2015. The Order to Show Cause issued by this Court on 4/15/2015 is DISCHARGED. (mdave)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
