Cloudpath Networks Inc v. SecureW2 Inc et al
| Cloudpath Networks Inc |
| SecureW2 Inc, Basz Universal LLC, Jeffrey Grimm, Bharat Ram Kashyap and Roger Haney |
| 1:2015cv00485 |
| March 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Jefferson |
| William J. Martinez |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 58 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Cloudpaths Count One is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE IN PART and SUSTAINED IN PART to the extent explained in Part III.B, supra; Cloudpaths Counts Two and Three are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendant SecureW2 B.V.s Rule 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint 58 is DENIED, by Judge William J. Martinez on 01/13/2016.(cthom, )
|
|
Filing
62
MINUTE ORDER; 60 Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order is GRANTED, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/10/15.(morti, )
|
|
Filing
53
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/11/15. Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order # 51 is GRANTED.(lgale, )
|
|
Filing
45
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/6/15. (lgale, )
|
|
Filing
35
STIPULATED ORDER PURSUANT TO F.R.E. 502(d) by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/28/15. (lgale, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
