Arakji v. Martinez et al
| Mazen Arakji |
| Martinez, Becker, Brewer, Fayles, Lease, Lingle, Sorrelles, Austin and Broomfield City and County |
| 1:2015cv00681 |
| April 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Broomfield |
| Christine M. Arguello |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff by Clerk on 2/26/2016. (vbarn)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 102 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim as indicated in the attached Order. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/02/2015. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER granting 137 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/30/15.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER denying 127 Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/16/15.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER Affirming 86 June 26, 2015 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24 re 75 Notice of Appeal (Doc. # 81 ) is DENIED. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 07/24/2015. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER denying 97 and 98 Motions to Stay. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 07/13/2015. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
83
MINUTE ORDER; 66 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiffs proposed Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 66-1) is ACCEPTED FOR FILING, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/25/15.(morti, )
|
|
Filing
80
MINUTE ORDER denying 73 Plaintiff's Motion for a Stay of the Order Overruling Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate's Orders Pending Appeal ; denying as duplicative 76 Plaintiff's Motion for a Stay of the Order Overruling Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate's Orders Pending Appeal, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/23/2015.(emill)
|
|
Filing
58
MINUTE ORDER; Plaintiff's Motion for Compelling Defendant City and County of Broomfield to Produce Names and Addresses of Police Officers 45 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Clarification of Dead line to File Responsive Pleading 55 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Compelling Defendant City and County of Broomfield for Initial Disclosure of True Names of Officers John Doe 19 and John Doe 4 56 is DENIED AS MOOT, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/22/15.(morti, )
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 05/01/2015. Plaintiff's Motion for Compelling Initial Disclosures of Address of Defendant Police Officer Cliff Hess So That He May Be Served With Complaint and Summons (Docket No. 18 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE FOR PRO SE PLAINTIFF(S) Status Conference set for 6/16/2015 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/30/2015. (emill)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Drawing Case; This case shall be drawn to a presiding judge, and whenapplicable to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/27/15. (morti, )
|
|
Filing
14
MINUTE ORDER; Plaintiff's Motions for seeking Discovery 4 and for a shorter period to respond to interrogatory 5 are DENIED as premature, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/21/15.(morti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
