Shabazz v. Pinnacle Credit Services LLC
Plaintiff: Leona Shabazz
Defendant: Pinnacle Credit Services LLC
Case Number: 1:2015cv00687
Filed: April 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: William J. Martinez
Presiding Judge: Nina Y. Wang
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER granting in part 59 Motion for Attorney Fees and denying 68 Motion for Review of Clerk's Taxing of Costs. Plaintiff is Awarded $28,104 in attorneys' fees. Ordered by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/23/2016. (cthom, )
March 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 FED.R.CIV.P. 68 OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE OF JUDGMENT. re: 55 , by clerk on 3/22/2016. (dhans, )
March 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 03/11/16. Telephonic Discovery Conference set for 3/16/2016 03:00 PM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
January 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 45 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Motion Hearing held on 1/11/2016 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. For witnesses who appear for both this action and Johnson v. Pinnacle, the depositions will occur in separate transcripts unless otherwise agre ed to by the Parties. Tanya Larkin shall appear for the deposition in this matter scheduled for January 13, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. Expedited Motion for Protective Order and Request for Telephonic Hearing 42 is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. FTR: Courtroom C-204. (bsimm, )
January 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/7/16. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Shorten the Time Pursuant to D.C.COLO.L.Civ.R 45.1 to Serve Tonya Larkin to Appear for Her Deposition 38 is GRANTED. Plaintiff must serve Ms. Larkin with a subpoena for her attendance at the deposition at least 48 hours prior to the time scheduled for the deposition. (bsimm, )
August 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 PROTECTIVE ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/6/15. (bsimm, )
May 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/18/15. Scheduling Conference set for 7/29/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. (bsimm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shabazz v. Pinnacle Credit Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pinnacle Credit Services LLC
Represented By: Joseph J. Lico
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leona Shabazz
Represented By: David Michael Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?