USA v. $14,766.03 in United States Currency

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit Colorado District Court USA v. $14,766.03 in United States Currency

USA v. $14,766.03 in United States Currency

Plaintiff:	USA
Defendant:	$14,766.03 in United States Currency
Case Number:	1:2015cv00964
Filed:	May 6, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office:	Denver Office
County:	Denver
Presiding Judge:	Nina Y. Wang
Nature of Suit:	Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action:	21 U.S.C. § 881
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 23, 2015	Filing 17 FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/23/15. IT IS ORDERED, DECREED AND ADJUDGED: THAT forfeiture of $8,000.00 of Defendant $14,766.03 in United States currency shall enter in favor of the United States; the United States shall have full and legal title to theDefendant asset, and may dispose of Defendant asset in accordance with law and in accordance with the terms and provisions of the parties' Settlement Agreement; THAT the Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment; andTHAT a Certificate of Reasonable Cause, which this Order constitutes, is granted as to the Defendant asset pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. (bsimm, )
June 2, 2015	Filing 9 ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PILOT PROGRAM CONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6/2/15. Pilot Program Consent Form due by 6/10/2015. A Status Conference is set for 6/17/2015 02:30 PM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (bsimm, )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 23, 2015

Filing 17 FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/23/15. IT IS ORDERED, DECREED AND ADJUDGED: THAT forfeiture of $8,000.00 of Defendant $14,766.03 in United States currency shall enter in favor of the United States; the United States shall have full and legal title to theDefendant asset, and may dispose of Defendant asset in accordance with law and in accordance with the terms and provisions of the parties' Settlement Agreement; THAT the Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment; andTHAT a Certificate of Reasonable Cause, which this Order constitutes, is granted as to the Defendant asset pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. (bsimm, )

June 2, 2015

Filing 9 ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PILOT PROGRAM CONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6/2/15. Pilot Program Consent Form due by 6/10/2015. A Status Conference is set for 6/17/2015 02:30 PM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (bsimm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. $14,766.03 in United States Currency
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: $14,766.03 in United States Currency
Represented By:	Nadav Aschner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By:	Wayne Campbell(Designation Federal Agency Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?