Hamilton v. Boyd
Plaintiff: Jan B. Hamilton
Defendant: James B. Boyd
Case Number: 1:2015cv01107
Filed: May 28, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Pitkin
Presiding Judge: Craig B. Shaffer
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 122 MINUTE ORDER denying 117 "Pleading to Mail Summons to Defendants" by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/11/16.(dkals, )
January 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER denying Petitions 108 , 113 , and 114 by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/27/16.(dkals, )
November 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/12/15. The Clerk shall send Plaintiff 68 Minute Order (mailed as ordered). (dkals, )
September 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 60 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; and denying without prejudice 66 Motion for Change of Judge in Designated Cases, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 09/01/15.(nmarb, )
August 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion to Clarify by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 08/24/15.(nmarb, )
August 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MINUTE ORDER denying 50 Motion to Appoint Investigator; denying 51 Motion for Summons; denying 52 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; AND denying 53 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff must file an Amended Complaint pursuant to 47 Order to File Amended Complaint, by September 8, 2015, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 08/13/15.(nmarb, )
August 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER To Open New Civil Case, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 08/06/15. (nmarb, )
July 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MINUTE ORDER granting 28 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 31 Motion for Administrative Order; denying as premature 32 Motion for District Judge In this Case, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 7/28/2015.(slibi, )
July 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 07/20/15 denying as moot 7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; 15 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; 16 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; and 25 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Denying 24 Motion for Contempt. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit her claims on the court-approved Prisoner Complaint form, in compliance with the May 29 and June 29 Orders, within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order.(nmarb, )
May 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 5/29/15. (dkals, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamilton v. Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jan B. Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James B. Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?