Stephenson v. Gray et al
| Davis T. Stephenson |
| Paul Gray and Cynthia Coffman |
| 1:2015cv01146 |
| June 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Montezuma |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER; 26 Motion to Reconsider Order to Dismiss in Part; To Amend Claim 5; and to Appoint an Attorney is DENIED as to the reconsideration of the Courts dismissal of Claim Four; DENIED as to the request for appointment of counsel; and GRANTED a s to the amendment of Claim Five. That Claims Three and Six in the Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [#1] are DISMISSED with prejudice as procedurally defaulted. 38 Motion to Deny Further Requests for Extensions of Time is DENIED as moot, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/29/16.(morti, )
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER TO FILE RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/14/16. (lgale, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and for Answer, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/25/15. (morti, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/2/15. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to the La Plata County District Court and the State Court Administrators Office (mailed as ordered). (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER TO FILE PRE-ANSWER RESPONSE by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 6/2/15. (dkals, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
