Johnson v. Hammer Adventures, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sharon A. Johnson
Defendant: Hammer Adventures, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2015cv01189
Filed: June 5, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Nina Y. Wang
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Pursuant to Procedural Order Number One 21 , a scheduling conference will be held on April 8, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout St reet, Denver, Colorado.. The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on March 29, 2016. The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or representatives of parties will be permitted to attend, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/8/16. (ktera)
January 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 PROCEDURAL ORDER NUMBER ONE Counsel will meet and confer as required by Rule 26(f)(2) within 30 days from the date of this order. Lead counsel shall attend the conference in person. The disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1)(A) shall be made wit hin 14 days after that conference. The proposed discovery plan will be in the form of the Scheduling Order which will be submitted to chambers in paper form 10 days before the date of the Scheduling Conference. Counsel for the plaintiff will te lephone chambers within 10 days after the disclosures to set a date and time for a Scheduling Conference pursuant to Rule 16. The instructions for preparation of the Scheduling Order and the form of that order are found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/6/16. (ktera)
December 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT On September 16, 2015, this Court entered an Order to Answer 16 on or before October 15, 2015. Nothing further has been filed. Counsel shall file a status report on or before December 14, 2015, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/7/15. (ktera)
September 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDERS Upon reassignment of this civil action and review of the record, the Order To Show Cause 6 is discharged, and the Minute Order entered September 15, 2015 11 is vacated, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/16/15. (ktera)
July 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/14/15. A Status Conference is set for 8/12/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The purpose of the initial conference is to consider the nature andstatus of the case, the timing for filing of any motions, and what discovery, if any, will be needed. (bsimm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Hammer Adventures, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon A. Johnson
Represented By: Michael Jon Ogborn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hammer Adventures, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?