Brigance v. Vail Corporation, The
| Teresa Brigance |
| Vail Corporation, The and Vail Summit Resorts |
| 1:2015cv01394 |
| June 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Nina Y. Wang |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT. ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 84 is GRANTED; 2. Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendant, Vail Summit Resorts, Inc., on all pending claims; 3. The Final Trial Prepara tion Conference scheduled for February 21, 2017, and the jury trial scheduled to commence March 6, 2017, are VACATED; 4. All other pending trial-related motions -- including Defendant's Motion to Strike and Exclude Untimely or Undiscl osed Exhibits and Expert Witnesses 110 ; Defendant's Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Christopher Wall 119 ; Defendant's Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Dr. David Zierk 120 , and Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion To R estrict Public Access To The Expert Report of Christopher Wall 126 -- are DENIED AS MOOT; 5. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant on all claims and shall terminate this case; and 6. Defendant shall have its costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/13/2017. (dhans, ) Modified on 1/13/2017 to change document type to OPINION (dhans, ).
|
|
Filing
51
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 04/19/16 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 45 Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Deadline for Plaintiff to Disclose Liability Expert and Report. Dispositive Motions due by 7/1/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/7/716 is VACATED and RESET for 8/23/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 17 Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Defendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Claim One (Negligence) and Claim Two (Negligence Per Se) and DENIED as to all other claims; Claim One of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 6 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and Claim Two of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 6 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge William J. Martinez on 03/11/2016.(cthom, )
|
|
Filing
36
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 01/27/16 GRANTING 34 (Motion) Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Certain Deadlines. Designation of Affirmative Experts due 3/15/2016. Discovery due by 5/15/2016. Dispositive Motion s due by 6/1/2016. Designation of Rebuttal Experts due 4/15/2016. the proposed Pretrial Order is due 7 days prior to the Final Pretrial Conference. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/7/2016 10:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang.(nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
30
PROTECTIVE ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/6/15. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PILOT PROGRAM CONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/9/15. Consent Form due by 8/5/2015. Scheduling Conference set for 8/12/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom C204 b efore Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. (bsimm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
