Sponsel v. City of Thornton, Colorado
Plaintiff: Richard John Sponsel
Defendant: City of Thornton, Colorado
Case Number: 1:2015cv01616
Filed: July 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Raymond P. Moore
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Watanabe
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MINUTE ORDER denying 60 Motion for Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/27/2016.(slibi, )
April 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MINUTE ORDER denying 55 Plaintiff's Motion, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/8/2016. (emill)
March 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MINUTE ORDER granting 51 Defendant's Motion to Vacate Pre-Trial Conference. Final Pretrial Conference 4/7/2016 09:30 AM is VACATED. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/18/2016.(emill)
December 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MINUTE ORDER denying 37 Motion for court to take note, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/11/2015.(slibi, )
November 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MINUTE ORDER denying 32 pro se plaintiff's Motion. No request for relief being apparent, the motion is denied as not a proper motion. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/20/2015.(emill)
November 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MINUTE ORDER denying 28 Plaintiff's Motion (to take judicial notice), by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/17/2015.(emill)
November 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MINUTE ORDER denying 25 Motion, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/13/2015.(slibi, )
November 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER granting 14 Motion to Compel Plaintiff's F.R.C.P. [sic] 26(a)(1) Disclosures; granting 15 Motion to Strike Document ECF 12 . ORDERED that on or before 11/20/2015, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this court should not pay defendant's reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, incurred in having to file its Motion to Compel Plaintiff's F.R.C.P. [sic] 26(a)(1) Disclosures 14 , by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/04/2015.(slibi, )
October 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER denying 20 pro se plaintiff's Motion to End Scheduling Orders and Discoveries, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/19/2015.(emill)
July 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE FOR PRO SE PLAINTIFF. Status Conference set for 8/31/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 7/30/2015. (emill)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sponsel v. City of Thornton, Colorado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard John Sponsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Thornton, Colorado
Represented By: Marni Nathan Kloster
Represented By: Nicholas Christaan Poppe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?