Morris v. Cozza-Rhodes et al
| Brandon Morris |
| Teresa K. Cozza-Rhodes, Frank Stratta, Jose Santana and Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 1:2015cv01877 |
| August 31, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Raymond P. Moore |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER adopting 35 Report and Recommendations, denying as moot 24 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim and 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and for Lack of Jurisdiction. Judgment shall enter in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 5/4/2016. (cpear)
|
Filing
35
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: # 33 by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/4/16. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause is MADE ABSOLUTE. Thus, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Complaint # 1 be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (lgale, )
|
Filing
21
ORDER denying 5 Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/06/2015.(cthom, )
|
Filing
7
ORDER DRAWING CASE. ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge, and when applicable to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/25/2015. (agarc, )
|
Filing
3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/1/15. (dkals, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.