Fischer et al v. Klescewski et al
Christopher Fischer, Jessica Fischer, M. F. and T. F. |
Drew Klescewski, Nichole Backus, H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP, Josh Vaughn, Michael Deedon, Jeremy Ehrlich and Heidi Walts |
1:2015cv01995 |
September 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Boulder |
William J. Martinez |
Nina Y. Wang |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 121 ORDER GRANTING 80 Motion for Summary Judgment: Defendants Josh Vaughn, Michael Deedon, Jeremy Ehrlich, and Heidi Walts are entitled to judgment in their favor on all claims asserted against them, and such judgment will enter at the close of this c ase; and, 81 H&M Defendants' 81 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to the Fischers' claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, and otherwise DENIED. This case REMAINS SET for a Final Trial Preparation Conference on May 5, 2017, at 11:00 a.m., and a 5-day Jury Trial beginning on May 22, 2017, at 8:30 a.m., both in Courtroom A801. ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 03/22/2017. (cthom, ) |
Filing 41 PROTECTIVE ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/14/16. (bsimm, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/08/15 Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference set for 11/25/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.