Stapleton v. Colvin
| Renee M Stapleton |
| Carolyn Colvin and SSA Noticing |
| 1:2015cv02249 |
| October 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Adams |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER Granting 16 the parties stipulated motion for fees in the amount of $579.08 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff be allowed attorney fees of $579.08, which the Court finds to be reasonable, in full satisfaction of any and all EAJA attorney fee claims Plaintiff may have in this case, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 1/19/2016.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Remand seeking entry of judgment and a remand for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and th e case REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993), by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/21/2015.(evana, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
