Qureshi et al v. Penkhus Motor Company
Plaintiff: Humza Qureshi and Lauryn Qureshi
Defendant: Penkhus Motor Company
Case Number: 1:2015cv02337
Filed: October 21, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: El Paso
Presiding Judge: Nina Y. Wang
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/16/16 For Entry of Judgment in Favor of Defendant. Defendant Penkhus Motor Companys oral Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law pursuant to Rule 52(c) is DENIED AS MOOT. Based on th e evidence in the record, Plaintiffs have failed to establish a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The Clerk of the Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT in FAVOR of Defendant Penkhus Motor Company and AGAINST Plaintiffs Huzma Qureshi and Laur yn Qureshi pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Costs to be awarded to Defendant Penkhus Motor Company as the prevailing party under Rule 54(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure pursuant to a Bill of Costs filed no later than November 30, 2016. (nmarb, )
September 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/26/16. Defendant Penkhus Motor Company's Motion for Summary Judgment 12 is DENIED; and The Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/27/2016 REMAINS SET. (bwilk, )
November 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/5/15 Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference and Setting Deadline for Filing of Pilot Program Consent Form. Consent Form due by 12/11/2015. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 12/22/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Qureshi et al v. Penkhus Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Humza Qureshi
Represented By: Matthew R. Osborne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lauryn Qureshi
Represented By: Matthew R. Osborne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Penkhus Motor Company
Represented By: J. W. Downie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?