Medina v. Clovis Oncology, Inc. et al
| Sonny P. Medina |
| Clovis Oncology, Inc. and Patrick J. Mahaffy |
| 1:2015cv02546 |
| November 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Raymond P. Moore |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0078 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
ORDER granting 98 Venture Capitalist Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 103 Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 104 Clovis Defendants' Motion Requesting Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Class Action Complaint; granting in part and denying in part 105 Clovis Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 02/09/2017. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing
58
MINUTE ORDER; 56 Stipulated Motion to Set Schedule for Filing ConsolidatedComplaint and Response Thereto and to Stay Discovery and Related Proceedings Under the PSLRA is granted. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(3)(B), all discovery in this action shall be stayed until resolution of the forthcoming motion(s) to dismiss to be filed by the Defendants, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/4/16.(morti, )
|
|
Filing
55
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 53 Stipulated Motion to Set Schedule for Filing Consolidated Complaint and Response Thereto and to Stay Discovery and Related Proceedings by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 03/31/2016.(mdave, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion for Appointment ; denying 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting 15 Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting 17 Motion for Appointment ; granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Case No. 1:15-cv-02547-RBJ and Case No. 1:15-cv-02697-CBS are hereby CONSOLIDATED with t his action for all purposes, and future filings in all cases shall be docketed under Case No. 1:15-cv-02546-RM-MEH. U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty shall be assigned to this consolidated action. The referral 40 of the Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading is WITHDRAWN, and the Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading 39 is GRANTED as set forth herein. The Clerk is ORDERED to file a Notice of Entry of this Order on the docket of cases1:15-cv-02547-RBJ and 1:15-cv-02697-CBS. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 02/18/2016.(cthom, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER in relation to Summons. Plaintiff, represented by Attorney Alexander Krot, is ORDERED to file a Proposed Summons on or before January 22, 2016. Plaintiff is further ORDERED to serve the Summons and Complaint on defendants on or before, and pref erably long before, February 17, 2016; The response deadline for the motions to consolidate related actions, appoint lead plaintiff, and approve selection of lead counsel (ECF Nos. 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18) is February 9, 2016. Other than for defendant s, this deadline will not be extended absent exigent circumstances. The Clerk is ORDERED to file a Notice of Entry of this Order on the docket of cases: 1:15-cv-02547-RBJ and 1:15-cv-02697-CBS. Ordered by Judge Raymond Moore on 01/21/2016. (cthom, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
