Archuleta v. Archuletta et al
Plaintiff: Pete Archuleta
Defendant: Lou (I) Archuletta, Francis (I) Falk, Travis (I) Trani and Rick Raemisch
Case Number: 1:2015cv02664
Filed: December 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Lincoln
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER: 59 Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED; 23 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Jury Demand is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 3/21/17. (jdyne, )
April 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER; Defendants' 14 Motion to Stay Discovery and Vacate Scheduling Conference is GRANTED. Discovery is stayed in this matter until the final ruling on the Motion to Dismiss. The parties shall file a status report withinten days of the same to advise if the previously vacated Scheduling Conference should be reset, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/5/16.(morti, )
January 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER; The court shall hold a Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) scheduling and planning conference on February 11, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. (Mountain Time). The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, pursuant to District of ColoradoElectronic Case Filing (ECF) Procedures V.5.12, on or before 5:00 p.m. (Mountain Time) on February 4, 2016, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/6/16. (morti, )
December 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 2/11/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Consent Form due by 2/4/2016, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/21/15. (sgrim)
December 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DRAWING CASE by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/10/15. (dkals, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Archuleta v. Archuletta et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pete Archuleta
Represented By: Elisabeth L. Owen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lou (I) Archuletta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Francis (I) Falk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Travis (I) Trani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rick Raemisch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?