Abreu v. Modis of Breckenridge, Inc.
Plaintiff: Santiago Abreu
Defendant: Modis of Breckenridge, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2015cv02715
Filed: December 15, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Kristen L. Mix
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12181
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/19/16. Motion to Stay Action to Facilitate Settlement Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6 # 9 is DENIED without prejudice.(lgale, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abreu v. Modis of Breckenridge, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Santiago Abreu
Represented By: Brett Norman Huff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Modis of Breckenridge, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?