Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc. v. Sulehri et al
| Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc. |
| Rashid Sulehri, Muhammad Kamran, Rashid Sulehri and Muhammad Kamran and JAV 3, LLC |
| 1:2015cv02781 |
| December 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Robert E. Blackburn |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
MINUTE ORDER granting 22 Plaintiff's Motion to Clarify. Scheduling Conference and Show Cause Hearing 6/2/2016 10:00 AM are VACATED. Scheduling Conference and Show Cause Hearing RE-SET for 6/14/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Deadline to file proposed scheduling order 6/7/2016. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/30/2016.(emill) (Main Document 24 replaced on 3/30/2016) (slibi, ).
|
|
Filing
20
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Substituted Service Against Defendants Rashid Sulehri and Muhammad Kamran, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/28/2016. (emill)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE Scheduling Conference set for 2/25/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/6/2016. (emill)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
