Brandt et al v. Honnecke et al
| Steven Lee Brandt and James Clay Walters |
| Von Honnecke, Chase Honnecke and S&H Heating, A/C, Sheetmetal Co. |
| Chase Honnecke, Von Honnecke and S&H Heating, A/C, Sheetmetal Co. |
| Steven Lee Brandt and James Clay Walters |
| 1:2015cv02785 |
| December 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Jefferson |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
298
ORDER on Defendants' Motion to Strike. The Court ORDERS as follows: Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Post-Judgment Motion for Enhanced Damages Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and Motion for Exceptional Case (ECF No. 275 ) is GRANTED; Plaintiffs' Motion for Enhanced Damages (ECF No. 267 ) is STRICKEN; and Plaintiffs' Motion for Exceptional Case (ECF No. 268 ) is STRICKEN. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 03/18/2020. (rvill, )
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 125 MOTION to Exclude Motion to Exclude Opinions of Messrs. Honnecke and Gardner. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/28/2018. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing
180
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 124 Motion to Exclude Opinion Testimony of Mr. J. Gregory Whitehair. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/25/2018. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing
178
ORDER the Defendants' affirmative defense and counterclaim based on any allegations of misuse are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and, the Plaintiff's 138 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT based on Plaintiffs' argumen ts for summary judgment as to Defendants' affirmative defense and counterclaim based on misuse and GRANTED as to Defendants' affirmative defense and counterclaim based on inequitable conduct and such affirmative defense and counterclaim are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/19/2018. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing
176
ORDER denying 123 Objection/Motion to Exclude/Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Infringement Contentions. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/14/2018. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/23/2018. Defendants' Motion for Protective Order 120 is DENIED; Plaintiffs are permitted to conduct the deposition of Mr. Von Honnecke in accordance with the directions and limitations identified in this Order; and Plaintiffs' request for costs and fees associated with responding to the instant Motion is DENIED. (nywlc2, )
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER on Claim Construction by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/12/2018. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/21/2017. Defendants' Motion for Two-Day Extension of Time 129 is GRANTED; and Plaintiffs shall FILE a Response to the Motion to Exclude Testimony of Mark Pedigo no later than January 8, 2018. (nywlc2, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/1/16 Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference and Setting Deadline for Filing of Consent/Non-Consent Form. Consent Form due by 3/21/2016. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 3/28/2016. Scheduling and Planning Conference set for 4/4/2016 03:00 PM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DRAWING CASE. ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge, and when applicable to a magistrate judge. by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 2/29/2016. (agarc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
