Matson et al v. Dillon Companies, Inc.
| Merwyn Matson and Audrey Matson |
| Dillon Companies, Inc. |
| 1:2016cv00103 |
| January 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Jefferson |
| Christine M. Arguello |
| Nina Y. Wang |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER Adopting and Affirming 20 March 8, 2016 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. # 18 ) is GRANTED. Audrey Matson's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 04/06/2016. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
17
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/29/16. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/19/16. A Scheduling Conference is set for 3/8/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall submit their proposed schedulin g order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. Counsel/pro se parties in this case shall hold a pre-scheduling conference meeting and prepare a proposed Scheduling Order twenty-one days prior to the Scheduling Conference. (bsimm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
