Estes v. Werlich et al
Petitioner: Jonathan N. Estes
Respondent: T. G. Werlich, M. D. Carvajal, Rick Raemisch and John Suthers
Case Number: 1:2016cv00141
Filed: January 19, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Gordon P. Gallagher
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 181 ORDER Adopting October 22, 2021 175 and December 21, 2021 180 Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge. Overruling Petitioner's 178 Objections; Denying as moot Petitioner's 159 Letter; Granting in part and denying in part Petitioner's 169 Letter. Entered by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/3/2022. (hguer)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 180 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 21 December 2021. The Court recommends that claim five of the amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 9 be denied as procedurally defaulted, or, alternatively, on the merits. The Court recommends that the amended Application be dismissed with prejudice. The Court recommends that a certificate of appealability be denied because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing that jurists of reason would debate the correctness of this procedural ruling or that his constitutional rights were violated not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (cmadr, )
March 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER GRANTING 75 Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and OVERRULING 78 Objections. The 9 Petitioner's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and all proceedings are STAYED until Petitioner has exhausted his state court remedies, provided that Petitioner presents his unexhausted claims to the state court within thirty days from the date of this Order. ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 03/06/2017. (cthom, )
January 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 75 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re denying 9 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jonathan N. Estes, and that this case be stayed pending Petitioner's exhaustion of state court remedies; ORDER denying without prejudice 70 Request for Oral Argument and for the Court to Appoint Counsel filed by Jonathan N. Estes, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/20/2017. (slibi, )
March 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER DRAWING CASE by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/25/16. Cynthia Coffman is substituted as Respondent for John Suthers. 21 Motion for Order Directing Respondents to Provide State Court Record and to Respond Within Thirty Days of Its Receipt is granted. 22 "Motion for Evidentiary Hearing to Develop [sic] Martinez Claim to Show Cause and Prejudice for the Applicants Procedural Default" is denied. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to the Denver County District Court and the Office of the State Court Administrator (mailed as ordered). (dkals, )
February 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER TO FILE PRE-ANSWER RESPONSE by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 2/10/16. (dkals, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Estes v. Werlich et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jonathan N. Estes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: T. G. Werlich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. D. Carvajal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rick Raemisch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Suthers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?