Dawson v. Archambeau et al
| James R. Dawson, Jr. |
| Jeff Archambeau, C. Irelend, T. Sicotte, R. Frickey and R. Havens |
| 1:2016cv00489 |
| February 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Nina Y. Wang |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
284
ORDER Granting 243 Defendant Nurse Practitioner Robert Frickey's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Exhaustion. It is ORDERED that summary judgment shall enter in favor of Defendant Frickey and against Plaintiff. Mr. Dawson's Eighth Amendment claims against Dr. Ireland and Ms. Sicotte for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in failing to provide any treatment for acute pain remain, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/10/2020.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
242
ORDER Granting 226 Mr. Frickey's Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Exhaustion (Doc. # 226 ). That Plaintiff James R. Dawson, Jr.'s Motion to Strike Mr. Frickey's Motion for Leave to File Summar y Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) (Doc. # 231 ) is DENIED. That Mr. Frickey's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Exhaustion (Doc. # 226-2) and accompanying exhibits (Doc. ## 226-3, 226-4, and 226-5) are ac cepted for filing and shall be docketed by the Clerk's Office as separate documents with their own ECF Numbers. That Plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days to respond to Mr. Frickey's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Exhaustion. Mr. Frickey shall have seven (7) days from the date of Plaintiffs Response, if any, to reply in support of his motion, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/24/2020.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
214
OPINION and ORDER ON REMAND by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/13/2020. ORDERED that defendants Jeff Archambeau, Rick Raemisch, and Susan Tionas Motions for Summary Judgment (# 144 and # 152) are GRANTED insofar as the Court has determined , on remand, that Mr. Dawson did not come forward with sufficient evidence to establish a deliberate indifference claim, invoking the 8th Amendment, against these defendants. The Motion to Set Case for Trial (# 209) is DENIED as moot in light of the Court's Opinion; Mr. Dawson's motions for appointment of counsel (# 207 and #208) will be decided in a separate order pursuant to the Court's Local Rules; and the Motion for Copy of the Docket (# 210) is GRANTED insofar as the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of the docket report to Mr. Dawson at his address of record as soon as practicable. (docket report mailed as ordered). (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER GRANTING 141 Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING 144 Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING 152 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 174 Motion to Strike ; DENYING 175 Motion for Order; DENYING 178 Motion for Leave; GRANTING 179 Motion for Summary Judgment by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/30/18. (pglov)
|
|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6/7/17. Mr. Dawson's "Second Renewed Motion for Appointment of Counsel Based Upon Court's Recharacterization of Plaintiff's Complaint" 131 is DENIED without prejudice. (bwilk, )
|
|
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/19/17. Mr. Dawson's Renewed Motion for Appointment of Counsel Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and D.C.COLO.LAttyR 15(g) 118 is DENIED without prejudice; and A copy of this Order shall be sent to James R. Dawson, Jr. (bwilk, )
|
|
Filing
34
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Stay, by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/04/2016. Status Conference set for 5/11/2016 is VACATED. Plaintiff shall file a Response to Defendant Frickeys Motion to Dismiss 27 and Defendant Frickeys Motion for Reconsideration 29 on or before 6/01/2016.(slibi, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
