Applegate et al v. Heath Consultants, Inc.
Retha Applegate and Ernest Applegate |
Heath Consultants, Inc. |
1:2016cv00648 |
March 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Richard P. Matsch |
Other Labor Litigation |
29 U.S.C. ยง 623 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant's motion for summary judgment Doc. 23 is GRANTED, and the clerk shall enter judgment for Heath Consultants, Inc. dismissing this action, with an award of costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/1/17. (ktera) |
Filing 10 PROCEDURAL ORDER NUMBER ONE Counsel will meet and confer as required by Rule 26 (f)(2) within 30 days from the date of this order. Lead counsel shall attend the conference in person. The disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1)(A) shall be made withi n 14 days after that conference. The proposed discovery plan will be in the form of the Scheduling Order which will be submitted to chambers in paper form 10 days before the date of the Scheduling Conference. Counsel for the plaintiff will telepho ne chambers within 10 days after the disclosures to set a date and time for a Scheduling Conference pursuant to Rule 16. The instructions for preparation of the Scheduling Order and the form of that order are found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/23/2016. (evana, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.