Davis v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
| Gilbert D. Davis |
| United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Robert (I) A. Mc Donald, Robert A. Mc Donald, Office Of Privacy And Records Managment, F. John Buck, Jr., F. (I) John Buck, Jr., Records Managment Center, Richard Leisure, Richard (I) Leisure, Jim Horan, Jim (I) Horan, Denver Regional Office, Melanie Renaye Murphy, Melanie (I) Renaye Murphy, Greg Linnert and Greg (I) Linnert |
| 1:2016cv00701 |
| March 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 8/22/17 GRANTING 32 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. As the court ruled from the bench on July 11, 2017, Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production (doc. #31) and Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (doc. #37) are DENIED. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear his or its own costs. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 04/04/16 GRANTING 4 Motion to Restrict Access or to Amend Complaint. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs unredacted Complaint (Doc. 1) shall be restricted under Level 1 restriction.(nmarb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
