Tatonka Capital Corporation v. Connelly et al
| Tatonka Capital Corporation |
| Michael Connelly, Dawn Eidelman and Gene Eidelman |
| 1:2016cv01141 |
| May 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| Nina Y. Wang |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
OPINION and ORDER by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/25/2019, re: 134 Mr. Connelly's Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court VACATES the May 20, 2019 Judgment (# 132),and directs the Cle rk of the Court to enter an amended judgment, in favor of Tatonka and against Mr. Connelly, in the amount of $998,070, with costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d). That sum will bear post-judgment interest at the rate set by Colorado law. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
131
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 5/20/19. (pglov)
|
|
Filing
122
OPINION AND ORDER granting 117 Renewed Motion to Strike by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/13/18. A Bench Trial is set for 12/4/2018 09:00 AM before Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
112
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 83 Motion for Summary Judgment, and denying 93 Motion for Summary Judgment, by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 7/18/18. (dkals, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
