Anthony v. City and County of Denver
| Thomas R. Anthony |
| City and County of Denver, Michael B. Hancock, Michael (I) B. Hancock, City Council of the City and County of Denver, Anthony Sandoval, Anthony (I) Sandoval, Mark Rudolph, Mark (I) Rudolph, Keith Erffmeyer, Keith (I) Erffmeyer, Judith Montero, Melissa MacTavish, Denver Urban Renewal Authority and Western Stock Show Association |
| 1:2016cv01223 |
| May 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Raymond P. Moore |
| Nina Y. Wang |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
260
ORDER. The Court ORDERS as follows: Plaintiff's "Request for Ruling on Motion to File RSASC" (ECF No. 234 ) is DENIED; and Plaintiff's "Motion for Extension to File Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment, and Request to Upload Exhibits" (ECF No. 235 ) is GRANTED IN PART in that the documents have been made available electronically and the deadline for Plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment is extended to March 19, 2021. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on March 5, 2021. (rvill, )
|
|
Filing
253
ORDER. It is ORDERED (1) that Plaintiff's Answer and separate statements (ECF Nos. 249 and 250 ) are hereby STRICKEN; and (2) that Plaintiff is granted leave to file a compliant response and separate statement, with supporting evidence, by Th ursday, February 25, 2021. The Court strongly encourages Plaintiff to contact the Federal Pro Se Clinic which provides free assistance to people representing themselves in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on February 19, 2021. (rvill, )
|
|
Filing
225
ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Rule 6(b)(1)(B) (ECF No. 224 ) is DENIED. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on January 21, 2021. (rvill, )
|
|
Filing
190
ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse, including Second Request for Investigation (ECF No. 186 ) is DENIED. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 09/03/2020. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER That the Motion to Alter or Amend (ECF No. 171 ) is granted in part and denied in part as stated herein; That the Final Judgment (ECF No. 168 ) is hereby VACATED; That on or before February 28, 2020, Defendants shall file any opening brief and, on or before March 20, 2020, Plaintiff may file any response brief on the question of issue and claim preclusion. Both briefs are limited to 20 pages, exclusive of the certificate of service, and shall be limited to the issue as stated above . Any additional arguments or issues, e.g., amendment of the complaint, will be stricken and will not be considered. No reply shall be allowed except as ordered by the Court; and That the case is STAYED pending a determination of whether the claims are nonetheless subject to dismissal based on preclusion as previously raised in Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 109 ), by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 2/7/2020.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
167
ORDER granting 109 Motion to Dismiss, denying 131 Motion to reconsider, and adopting 133 and 160 Reports and Recommendations. Judgment shall enter in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/11/2019. (cpear)
|
|
Filing
160
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/4/2018. The undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that the court DENY Plaintiff's Motion to File Replacement Second Amended and Supplemented Complaint and Reconsider Order of Sept. 29, 2017 In Part 131 . (nywlc2, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
